MANCHESTER — What began as a simple question on The Manchester Enterprise's Facebook page has turned into one of the largest community conversations of the summer.
On July 9, the Enterprise asked readers, "Does Manchester/Clay County need a water park?"
Within days, over 100,000 viewers had weighed in, and while opinions differed on whether the county/city/tourism should build a traditional public swimming pool, a full-scale water park or something in between, one thing became abundantly clear.
Clay Countians overwhelmingly believe it's time to invest in aquatic recreation.
The discussion mirrored another recent Enterprise Facebook post asking whether Clay County needed a data center, which generated thousands of comments and ultimately prompted city leaders to adopt a temporary moratorium while the issue could be studied.
This time, however, the response was remarkably unified.
Families want something to do
One of the most common themes throughout the discussion centered on giving children and families more opportunities close to home.
Whitney Johnson summed up what many parents expressed.
"We definitely need stuff like this. It would also possibly draw more people and it would open up jobs for teenagers. I think it's all around a great idea."
Lashay Roark echoed the sentiment.
"Kids need things to do besides getting bored and getting into trouble. I am 100% for improving the county & the community."
Many commenters said children currently have few recreational options during the summer outside of the splash pad or traveling to neighboring counties.
Keep local dollars at home
Economic development became another recurring theme.
Residents repeatedly pointed out that families already spend hundreds—even thousands—of dollars every summer at pools and water parks in Williamsburg, London, Somerset, Corbin and beyond.
Melissa Estep wrote,
"Why take our business out of town to enjoy the summer... make it reasonable so everyone can enjoy the water park."
Kathy-Trevor Smith agreed.
"Then when we drive far away like that we eat out of town & get gas out of town as well. It's a major tourist attraction."
Madison Maggard believed the impact could extend beyond admission fees.
"Think of how many surrounding areas then would come to our town just for this then would probably stop at a gas station or restaurant. Clay County would thrive."
Jobs for local teenagers
Another topic mentioned repeatedly was employment.
Laura Ann said proper maintenance would be key but added,
"It would be a great job opportunity for students as well."
Amber Saylor noted simply,
"Not to mention the summer jobs that would be available for the teens."
Several residents also suggested lifeguard positions, concessions and maintenance jobs could provide valuable work experience for local high school and college students.
Memories of Beech Creek
Perhaps no subject generated more nostalgia than the former Beech Creek swimming pool.
Dozens of residents recalled spending nearly every summer day there growing up.
Pat Roof remembered,
"We rented the community center and pool for family reunions and kids had a blast! Why not open it back up?"
Sarah Beth Sester wrote,
"The pool was such a huge part of our childhood... it would be amazing to see it opened back up."
Others suggested reopening the existing location instead of constructing an entirely new facility.
More than just a swimming pool
While some residents said a traditional public pool would be enough, many envisioned something larger.
Ideas included:
Some even proposed locating the project on Elk Mountain, while others preferred rebuilding at the former Beech Creek location.
Not everyone agreed
Although support was overwhelming, a handful of residents urged caution.
David Martin reminded readers,
"As with anything of that nature, the taxpayers must be willing to fund it."
David Phillips added,
"My property tax is already too high."
Others stressed that maintenance, insurance, security and long-term operating costs would determine whether such a project could succeed.
A conversation worth having
While a Facebook discussion is not a scientific poll, nearly 1,000 comments provide a remarkable snapshot of public opinion.
The conversation revealed residents thinking beyond simply building a pool. Many viewed the idea as an investment in quality of life, youth recreation, tourism and economic development.
Whether Manchester and Clay County ever pursue a public pool, aquatic center or destination-style water park remains to be seen.
But if the response to The Manchester Enterprise's question is any indication, the community has spoken loudly.
For many residents, the desire isn't just for a place to swim.
It's for a place where local families can make memories without leaving Clay County.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here